File Geodatabase Feature Class
Tags
San Diego County, Raptors, MSCP, biota
Point data on raptor species locations were collected to provide an initial baseline of information on many of the breeding and wintering raptors within the MSCP and environs. These data will serve to identify appropriate long-term raptor monitoring locations, develop a scientifically based monitoring program (including survey locations and protocols), test the monitoring methods, and identify opportunities for population enhancements. For more information on project objectives, methods, and outcomes see The Wildlife Research Institute's final report. DATA ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS: These points represent a summary of WRI's raptor surveying activity for the period of January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2003, focusing on the breeding and wintering seasons. This work did not, officially, include the Burrowing Owl. Therefore, with few exceptions, surveys were not conducted during what would normally have been the most productive time for this species (i.e., early morning and early evening). Fieldwork was conducted during the daylight hours to maximize chances for seeing the diurnal raptors that were the focus of the contracted scope. Although nocturnal owls can be expected to nest and winter in many of the study sites, they would be expected to often escape observation under this temporal survey regime. However, the methods required documenting any raptor, regardless of whether or not it was a target species and, when a Burrowing Owl or any other owl was observed, it was noted. KNOWN CAVEATS OF THE DATA: A natural phenomenon created a situation that could be considered a constraint. This was the extreme drought that the region experienced for several years (1999-2004). Therefore, 2001 through 2003 may not have been the best of raptor breeding years. Drought clearly plays a significant factor in the density and reproductive success of raptors. This study was conducted during the worst drought for San Diego in over 160 years. This fact should be noted for future researchers and resource managers/planners. This kind of extreme drought has the potential effect of reducing the available prey biomass, which, in turn, can have at least two effects. First, it likely reduces the "attractiveness" of a habitat complex, partly because of low prey densities, and may encourage raptors and other predators to look elsewhere. Second, for those individuals that choose to stay in a less-than-ideal environment, the lack of prey often results in lowered reproductive success or even total nest failure. If a nest site is not successful, the birds are more likely to disperse, which leaves the historically active territories apparently, or actually, vacant. The unnatural type of constraints came in the form of restricted access. Although we did not experience any access restriction to city-owned property, we were partially restricted to one site (Navy Satellite Surveillance Station), which is juxtaposed to a city study site (Brown Field) and, because of delays in processing our request for access to a military site (North Island), we were only able to survey that site a limited number of times as part of a related NCCP study.
Raptor surveys were conducted in the Multiple Species Conservation Project (MSCP) area by the Wildlife Research Institute (WRI) from the Winter of 2001 through the summer of 2003. They examined 44 out of 45 sites and documented a total of 15 raptor species and 512 raptor breeding territories (this excludes burrowing owls, golden eagles and common ravens). Of the 512 raptor breeding territories, 71 were target species. A total of 20 raptor species were documented on our study sites during the winter months (January, February, and December) of 2001-2003. All target raptors, excluding the Swainson's Hawk, were documented during the winter observation period. Numbers ranged from 0 to 22 individual target raptors per site for a total of 154 individuals for all study sites. Comparable numbers for all raptors, including the Common Raven, were 0 to 145 as a range. A total of 1,153 wintering individuals were documented (or 819, without the ravens). The Common Raven was clearly the most common wintering bird of those surveyed for. The three most commonly documented wintering raptors were the Red-tailed Hawk, American Kestrel, and Red-shouldered Hawk, with totals of 291, 98, and 95, respectively. Of those sites surveyed in this study, the following held the highest number of wintering individuals (raptors and ravens): Site 25 (Proctor Valley) - 145, Site 36 (San Pasqual) - 121, Site 30 (Ramona Grasslands) - 91 (which included 9-16 Ferrunginous Hawks; with 20 documented in 2005), Site 33 (Penasquitos Canyon) - 76, and Site 7 (Lake Hodges) - 71. WHAT EACH RECORD REPRESENTS: Each record represents a summary (based on field biologists Jeff Lincer's and Dave Bittner's professional judgment) of raptor territories or nest sites for field surveys conducted from 2001 through 2003.
There are no credits for this item.
Disclaimer: The State makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or adequacy of these data and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in these data. No warranty of any kind, implied, expressed, or statutory, including but not limited to the warranties of non-infringement of third party rights, title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and freedom from computer virus, is given with respect to these data.
Use is restricted to employees of non-commercial organizations.
Extent
| West | -117.273619 | East | -116.705762 |
| North | 33.150447 | South | 32.526846 |
| Maximum (zoomed in) | 1:5,000 |
| Minimum (zoomed out) | 1:150,000,000 |
Disclaimer: The State makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or adequacy of these data and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in these data. No warranty of any kind, implied, expressed, or statutory, including but not limited to the warranties of non-infringement of third party rights, title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and freedom from computer virus, is given with respect to these data.
Use is restricted to employees of non-commercial organizations.