Pacific Marten - Coastal DPS - Proposed Critical Habitat - USFWS [ds3018]

File Geodatabase Feature Class

Open this dataset in BIOS
Download this dataset

Tags
biota, environment, Martes caurina, Pacific Marten, Coastal Distinct Population Segment, critical habitat, USFWS


Summary

Critical habitat constitutes areas considered essential for the conservation of a listed species. These areas provide notice to the public and land managers of the importance of the areas to the conservation of this species. Special protections and/or restrictions are possible in areas where Federal funding, permits, licenses, authorizations, or actions occur or are required.

Description

These data identify, in general, the areas of proposed critical habitat for Pacific Marten, Coastal Distinct Population Segment (Martes caurina).

Credits

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office

Use limitations

Disclaimer: The State makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or adequacy of these data and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in these data. No warranty of any kind, implied, expressed, or statutory, including but not limited to the warranties of non-infringement of third party rights, title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and freedom from computer virus, is given with respect to these data.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. These data and related graphics (e.g., GIF or JPG format files) are not legal documents and are not intended to be used as such. The information contained in these data may be dynamic and could change over time. The data are not better than the original sources from which they were derived. It is the responsibility of the data user to use the data appropriately and consistent within the limitations of geospatial data in general and these data in particular. The related graphics are intended to aid the data user in acquiring relevant data; it is not appropriate to use the related graphics as data. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data. It is strongly recommended that these data be directly acquired from an authorized U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service source and not indirectly through other sources which may have changed the data in some way. Although these data have been processed successfully on computer systems at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or through cooperators/contractors, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the utility of the data on other systems for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. This disclaimer applies both to individual use of the data and aggregate use with other data. The data are not to be used for legal survey use. Please refer to Federal Register Citation Number 86 FR 58831, published 20211025 for the legal critical habitat information.

Extent

West -124.566243 East -123.494314
North 44.326334 South 41.137864

Scale Range
Maximum (zoomed in) 1:5,000
Minimum (zoomed out) 1:150,000,000

ArcGIS Metadata

Topics and Keywords

Themes or categories of the resource biota, environment


* Content type Downloadable Data
Export to FGDC CSDGM XML format as Resource Description No

Place keywords California, Oregon

Theme keywords biota, environment

Thesaurus
Title ISO 19115 Topic Category


HideThesaurus


HideTopics and Keywords

Citation

Title Pacific Marten - Coastal DPS - Proposed Critical Habitat - USFWS [ds3018]
Publication date 2021-10-2500:00:00


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


HideCitation

Citation Contacts

Responsible party
Organization's name U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Contact's role point of contact


Contact information


HideCitation Contacts

Resource Details

Dataset languages * English(UNITED STATES)
Dataset character set utf8 - 8 bit UCS Transfer Format


Status completed
Spatial representation type vector


Processing environment Environment as of Metadata Creation: Microsoft Windows 10 Enterprise Version 20H2; Esri ArcGIS Pro 2.7.1; XTools Pro 18.1 (build 1059)


Credits
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office
ArcGIS item properties
* Name ds3018
* Location file://\\geodata.\\BIOSOnline\Refresh\TODOData\BIOSOnlineData.gdb
* Access protocol Local Area Network

HideResource Details

Extents

Extent
Geographic extent
Bounding rectangle
West longitude -124.5662
East longitude -123.4943
North latitude 44.3263
South latitude 41.1379
Extent contains the resource Yes

Vertical extent
* Minimum value 0.000000
* Maximum value 0.000000


Extent
Geographic extent
Bounding rectangle
Extent type Extent used for searching
* West longitude -124.566243
* East longitude -123.494314
* North latitude 44.326334
* South latitude 41.137864
* Extent contains the resource Yes

Vertical extent
* Minimum value 0.000000
* Maximum value 0.000000


Extent in the item's coordinate system
* West longitude -124.566243
* East longitude -123.494314
* South latitude 41.137864
* North latitude 44.326334
* Extent contains the resource Yes

HideExtents

Resource Points of Contact

Point of contact
Organization's name U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office
Contact's position Biologist - Data Manager
Individual's name Joel Shinn
Contact's role point of contact


Contact information
Phone
Voice 707-822-7201
Fax 707-822-8411

Address
Type both
Delivery point 1655 Heindon Rd.
City Arcata
Administrative area CA
Postal code 95521
Country US
e-mail address joel_shinn@fws.gov

HideContact information


HideResource Points of Contact

Resource Maintenance

Resource maintenance
Update frequency not planned


HideResource Maintenance

Resource Constraints

Constraints
Limitations of use

Disclaimer: The State makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or adequacy of these data and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in these data. No warranty of any kind, implied, expressed, or statutory, including but not limited to the warranties of non-infringement of third party rights, title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and freedom from computer virus, is given with respect to these data.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. These data and related graphics (e.g., GIF or JPG format files) are not legal documents and are not intended to be used as such. The information contained in these data may be dynamic and could change over time. The data are not better than the original sources from which they were derived. It is the responsibility of the data user to use the data appropriately and consistent within the limitations of geospatial data in general and these data in particular. The related graphics are intended to aid the data user in acquiring relevant data; it is not appropriate to use the related graphics as data. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data. It is strongly recommended that these data be directly acquired from an authorized U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service source and not indirectly through other sources which may have changed the data in some way. Although these data have been processed successfully on computer systems at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or through cooperators/contractors, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the utility of the data on other systems for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. This disclaimer applies both to individual use of the data and aggregate use with other data. The data are not to be used for legal survey use. Please refer to Federal Register Citation Number 86 FR 58831, published 20211025 for the legal critical habitat information.


Legal constraints
Limitations of use
See access and use constraints information.
HideResource Constraints

Spatial Reference

ArcGIS coordinate system
* Type Projected
* Geographic coordinate reference GCS_North_American_1983
* Projection NAD_1983_California_Teale_Albers
* Coordinate reference details
Projected coordinate system
Well-known identifier 3310
X origin -16909700
Y origin -8597000
XY scale 10000
Z origin -100000
Z scale 10000
M origin -100000
M scale 10000
XY tolerance 0.001
Z tolerance 0.001
M tolerance 0.001
High precision true
Latest well-known identifier 3310
Well-known text PROJCS["NAD_1983_California_Teale_Albers",GEOGCS["GCS_North_American_1983",DATUM["D_North_American_1983",SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137.0,298.257222101]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION["Albers"],PARAMETER["False_Easting",0.0],PARAMETER["False_Northing",-4000000.0],PARAMETER["Central_Meridian",-120.0],PARAMETER["Standard_Parallel_1",34.0],PARAMETER["Standard_Parallel_2",40.5],PARAMETER["Latitude_Of_Origin",0.0],UNIT["Meter",1.0],AUTHORITY["EPSG",3310]]

Reference system identifier
* Value 3310
* Codespace EPSG
* Version 6.8(9.2.0)


HideSpatial Reference

Spatial Data Properties

Vector
* Level of topology for this dataset geometry only


Geometric objects
Feature class name ds3018
* Object type composite
* Object count 0

HideVector


ArcGIS Feature Class Properties
Feature class name ds3018
* Feature type Simple
* Geometry type Polygon
* Has topology FALSE
* Feature count 0
* Spatial index TRUE
* Linear referencing TRUE

HideArcGIS Feature Class Properties


HideSpatial Data Properties

Data Quality

Scope of quality information
Resource level dataset


HideScope of quality information


Data quality report - Conceptual consistency
Measure description
No formal logical accuracy tests were conducted.


HideData quality report - Conceptual consistency


Data quality report - Completeness omission
Measure description
Data set is considered complete for the information presented, as described in the abstract. Users are advised to read the rest of the metadata record carefully for additional details.


HideData quality report - Completeness omission


HideData Quality

Lineage

Process step
Description
Preparing Coastline Removal Polygons Data were acquired from the NOAA Shoreline website, specifically the NOAA Continually Updated Shoreline Product (CUSP) for the western US (NOAA NGS, ongoing). Vector lines representing the coastline were used as the eastern side of a set of manually created polygons extending into the Pacific Ocean. These coastline removal polygons were developed in general areas where draft pCH polygons were near the coastline.


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles NOAA CUSP Shoreline


HideSource citation


HideSource data


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2020
Description
Applying Additional Cleanup BLM SMA data (BLM 2020) were used to manually remove any remaining small polygons from the pCH in OR that overlapped with SMA ADMIN_AGENCY_CODE values of "UND" and "PVT". Several iterations of manual vertex cleanup were applied to simplify polygon definitions that contained unnecessary complexity, likely a byproduct of combining data from various sources in the pCH development process. This cleanup exercise was required to allow pCH polygons to be processed in a tool that generates an exhaustive list of coordinate pairs that serve as a legal description of pCH boundaries.


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles BLM SMA 2020


HideSource citation


HideSource data


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-03
Description
Acquiring Coastal Marten Historical Range Data were acquired from the USFWS Arcata FWO, and are presumed to have been produced by the USFS Redwood Sciences Lab, as seen on p.2 of the USFS General Technical Report (Slauson et al. 2019a).


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles Hist Range


HideSource citation


HideSource data


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-03
Description
Preparing USFWS Modeled Habitat Data were acquired from the USFWS Coastal Marten Connectivity Analysis (Schrott and Shinn 2020). Specifically, polygons representing modeled habitat cores >= 300 hectares, the approximate size of 1 female marten home range. The coastal marten historical range was used to create a subset of cores that were completely or partially within its boundary.


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles USFWS Model


HideSource citation


HideSource data


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-03
Description
Preparing USFS Modeled Habitat Data were acquired from USFS Redwood Sciences Laboratory, as seen in Slauson et al. 2019b. These data are a continuous raster, with values >= 0.06 considered suitable. Raster calculator was used to create a binary raster, with non-zero values representing suitable habitat. The output was reprojected to NAD83 Albers and converted to vector polygons.


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles USFS Model


HideSource citation


HideSource data


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-03
Description
Developing Minimum Convex Hulls to represent Extant Population Areas (EPAs) Data were acquired from USFWS Arcata FWO (USFWS, unpublished data). These vector point data are a compilation of contemporary verifiable coastal marten detections as of 03/08/2019 from various sources. A 7500m buffer was applied to each detection. These buffers were dissolved to define 8 groups of detections. The easternmost grouping (in proximity to OR Caves National Monument) was removed from consideration because it contained an insufficient number of detections to be considered a population. The three adjacent coastal central OR groupings were all assigned to a single group. These point groupings were used to create minimum convex hulls. A 2km buffer was applied to each minimum convex hull, and the feature class was reprojected to NAD83 Albers.


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles Detections


HideSource citation


HideSource data


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-03
Description
Combining Model Data and Minimum Convex Hulls Prepared data from the aforementioned FWS Modeled Habitat, USFS Modeled Habitat, and Minimum Convex Hulls exercises were combined via Union. For the purposes of this documentation, this dataset can be considered the initial draft Proposed Critical Habitat (pCH) footprint from which subsequent additions, modifications, and removals were applied, as described in the GIS exercises in the paragraphs that follow.


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-04
Description
Preparing Klamath River Removal Polygon Data were acquired from USGS NHD for California, specifically the NHDFlowline dataset (U.S. Geological Survey 2013). The Klamath River was extracted from this dataset and reprojected to NAD83 Albers. Starting at the confluence of the Trinity River and extending southward and eastward, a polygon was created using the Klamath River line as the northern boundary. This polygon was developed to remove any areas south of the Klamath River, east of the confluence with the Trinity River, from the aforementioned union of model data and minimum convex hulls.


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles USGS NHD


HideSource citation


HideSource data


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-04
Description
Applying Klamath River Removal Polygon The Klamath River removal polygon was combined via Union with the aforementioned union of FWS/USFS modeled habitat and minimum convex hulls. All overlapping draft pCH polygons were marked for removal from the draft pCH footprint.


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-04
Description
Applying Additional Removals The resulting data were broken into singlepart features. This feature class was edited to conform to the following guidelines: Polygon features were only retained as draft pCH if they were from either the USFS or FWS model and had partial or complete overlap with a minimum convex hull. Additionally, long tendrils of modeled habitat (i.e. polygons that exhibited a high edge-to-interior ratio) that did not lead in the direction of additional pCH polygons were manually removed. Finally, one habitat core identified in the FWS model was extremely large relative to other cores, and was cleaved off at natural choke points when heading eastward away from occupied habitat.


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-04
Description
Preparing Hwy101 Line for Non-habitat Removal Packaged data were acquired from a Trimble Marketplace website that is no longer active, but source data are produced by OpenStreetMap Contributors and are available for download elsewhere (OpenStreetMap Contributors 2018). The OpenStreetMap highway_line dataset was used to isolate Highway 101 along the OR coast. This selected highway was exported to its own feature class for use in later operations.


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles OSM Roads


HideSource citation


HideSource data


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-04
Description
Developing 60% Concave Hulls From Contemporary Verifiable Detections The same dataset of contemporary verifiable detections used to create minimum convex hulls was used also used to create 60% concave hulls as follows. A 7500m buffer was applied to each detection. These buffers were dissolved to define 8 groups of detections. The easternmost grouping (in proximity to OR Caves National Monument) was removed from consideration because it contained an insufficient number of detections to be considered a population. Each group of detections was used to create a concave hull in XTools Pro, using a 60% level of detail parameter. This resulted in 7 concave hull polygons. A 2km planar buffer was applied to each concave hull. The previously-produced coastline and Klamath River removal polygons were used to eliminate overlap with the Pacific Ocean and areas south/east of the Klamath River confluence with the Trinity River. Additionally, Highway 101 from the OpenStreetmap dataset was used to manually remove all area east of Highway 101 for the two concave hull polygons on the Central OR coast near Coos Bay and Siltcoos Bay. These concave hull polygons were reprojected to NAD83 Albers.


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles Detections


HideSource citation


HideSource data


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-04
Description
Combining Select Model Data and 60% Concave Hulls Data from previous exercises were combined via Union: 60pct concave hulls, as well as the draft pCH footprint (i.e. model data from USFWS and USFS with aforementioned removals applied). The polygons created from this Union were dissolved into draft units. A 1 meter planar linear buffer was applied to the resulting data to merge small polygons found along the edges of large polygons; these small polygons were an artifact of combining and converting multiple modeled datasets from raster format to vector polygons in previous steps. Polygon parts that were contained within these larger polygons (i.e. holes in each polygon) were eliminated using Eliminate Polygon Part if they were less than 300ha in size (i.e. the holes were filled in). Smoothing was applied, using Smooth Polygon with the PAEK algorithm set to a tolerance of 300m, and with Input Barrier Layers set to the Klamath River and the coastline removal polygon datasets.


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-05
Description
Developing Land Use Allocation (LUA) Classifications LUA data were acquired from the Regional Ecosystem Office (REO) website for the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) (USDA Forest Service and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2013), as well as a BLM data portal providing data for the final Record of Decision (ROD) on Resource Management Plans (RMPs) for the Western Oregon SWO and NCO BLM offices (BLM 2016a, 2016b). LUA designations from the BLM SWO and NCO RMPs were used to represent BLM lands. LUA designations for USFS lands in OR and CA from the 2013 NWFP revision were used to represent non-BLM lands (i.e. USFS lands). The three LUA datasets were clipped to the draft pCH footprint and reprojected to NAD83 Albers. A Union operation was executed, consisting of the three LUA datasets and the draft pCH footprint. The attribute table from this unioned LUA dataset was exported to MS Excel, where the LUA designations were reclassified into more generalized designations of "reserve", "quasi-reserve", and "non-reserve" lands. In this reclassification, the two non-overlapping BLM datasets held precedent with regard to their LUA classifications. Where BLM classifications were not present, the NWFP LUA designation was used. All other draft pCH areas that were not included in these LUA datasets were classified as Non-reserve. The following classification types were reclassified to reserve: Congressionally Reserved Lands and National Conservation Lands, Late-Successional Reserve, Riparian Reserve, Adaptive Management Reserve, and Congressionally Withdrawn. The following classification types were reclassified to quasi-reserve: Administratively Withdrawn, Adaptive Management Area, and District-Designated Reserve. The following classification types were reclassified to non-reserve: Harvest Land Base, Matrix, Not Designated, and Other. The MS Excel spreadsheet containing the generalized LUA reclassifications was then Joined back to the unioned spatial data to complete the process.


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles NWFP LUA


HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles BLM NCO ROD


HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles BLM SWO ROD


HideSource citation


HideSource data


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-05
Description
Preparing Hybrid Land Classification Data The Surface Management Agency (SMA) GIS dataset was acquired from the BLM Landscape Approach Data Portal (BLM 2019), and was used for general land management classification. This dataset was clipped to the draft pCH footprint. Data from various sources were gathered in preparation for a Union that would yield the following classifications: Reserve, Existing CH, Tribal Trust, Other Federal, State, and Other. Reserve: Federal reserve lands as described in the section titled "LUA Development" (where generalized LUA classifications are "reserve" or "quasi-reserve") were considered Reserve for this exercise. Existing CH: Existing final critical habitat data were acquired from the FWS ECOS website (USFWS ECOS) to identify active critical habitat from all species that fall within the pCH footprint (specifically CH designations from marbled murrelet, northern spotted owl, Oregon silverspot butterfly, and western snowy plover). These data were clipped to the draft pCH footprint. These data were then dissolved to eliminate overlapping polygons. Tribal Trust: SMA data were used to select lands with an ADMIN_AGENCY_CODE value of BIA; selected data were exported to a new dataset. Other Federal: SMA data were used to select lands with ADMIN_AGENCY_CODE values of BLM, NPS, USACE, and USFS; selected data were exported to a new dataset. State: SMA data were used to select lands with an ADMIN_AGENCY_CODE value of ST; selected data were exported to a new dataset. Other: The draft pCH footprint was used to represent the Other category. In other words, lands that did not fall into any of the aforementioned categories were classified as Other (e.g. private lands, local government lands, etc.).


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles BLM SMA 2019


HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles USFWS Critical Habitat


HideSource citation


HideSource data


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-06
Description
Combining Hybrid Land Classification Data Data from the preceding preparation exercise were combined via Union: Reserve, Existing CH, Tribal Trust, Other Federal, State, and Other. The attribute table from this unioned dataset was exported to MS Excel, where the six datasets comprising the Union were reclassified into the aforementioned categories of Reserve, Existing CH, Tribal Trust, Other Federal, State, and Other. To address overlap among these datasets, a ranking was set as follows (highest to lowest): Reserve, Existing CH, State, Tribal Trust, Other Federal, and Other. Note that this is not a ranking of importance with regard to inclusion in pCH, it is merely to handle overlap among datasets appropriately and achieve the correct classification. The MS Excel spreadsheet containing these classifications was then Joined back to the unioned spatial data to complete the process. The Union dataset was then dissolved on these six classifications, and the resulting data were broken into singlepart features.


HideProcess step


Process step
When the process occurred 2019-07
Description
Applying Removals and Data Cleanup Three datasets were combined via Union: the results of our land categorization exercise (yielding 6 classifications of Reserve Lands, Existing Critical Habitat, State Lands, Other Federal Lands, Other (non-tribal trust) Lands, and Tribal Trust Lands), state line boundaries acquired from the TIGER/Line dataset (U.S. Census Bureau 2017), and the draft pCH footprint that was used in the preceding land categorization exercise, which contained unit classifications for 6 draft pCH units. Thus, the Union provides a dataset with land categorizations, state boundaries, and draft pCH units. From this unioned dataset, several polygons were marked for removal from draft pCH at the direction of the core team, using the following general criteria: All noncontiguous polygons that were considered unoccupied based on the contemporary verifiable marten detections dataset, all noncontiguous polygons with an area less than 300ha, all OR lands with the land category "Other", polygons managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (SMA classification with ADMIN_AGENCY_CODE = "USACE"), and select polygons deemed nonessential (based on detection data, absence of marten physical and biological features (PBFs), etc.). With these removals applied, the draft pCH dataset was then dissolved to form 5 units. A feature class of "patches" was manually developed to fill in any small holes, seams or other topological errors that existed in the unioned dataset as a result of combining data from different sources. The patches were then applied to the draft pCH via Union.


Source data
Relationship to the process step used


Source citation
Alternate titles TIGER State Lines


HideSource citation


HideSource data


HideProcess step


Source data
Description
Refer to the Federal Register 86 FR 58831, 20211025.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy resources
Source citation
Title Federal Register
Alternate titles Federal Register Document
Publication date 2021-10-25


Responsible party
Organization's name Office of the Federal Register
Contact's role originator


Responsible party
Organization's name Federal Register
Contact's role publisher


Contact information
Address
Delivery point Washington, DC

HideContact information


Resource location online
Location http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/publications/index.html

HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
Shoreline used to develop polygons for clipping any pCH polygons overlapping with the Pacific Ocean.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title NOAA Continuously Updated Shoreline Product (CUSP)
Alternate titles NOAA CUSP Shoreline
Publication date
Indeterminate date unknown


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


Other citation details
Data acquired 201904.


Responsible party
Organization's name National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
Contact's role originator


Resource location online
Location https://shoreline.noaa.gov/data/

HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
highway_line data used to define hwy 101 in coastal OR.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title OpenStreetMap PlanetData: Highways (highway_line)
Alternate titles OSM Roads
Publication date 2019


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


Other citation details
Data acquired from https://market.trimbledata.com/, which is no longer active.


Responsible party
Organization's name OpenStreetMap Contributors
Contact's role originator


Resource location online
Location https://www.openstreetmap.org/

HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
Habitat cores from the coastal marten connectivity analysis with a minimum core area size of 300 hectares.(approx. 1 female marten home range in size).


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title A Landscape Connectivity Analysis for the Coastal Marten (Martes caurina humboldtensis)
Alternate titles USFWS Model
Publication date 2020-05


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


Responsible party
Organization's name Schrott, G.R. and J. Shinn (USFWS)
Contact's role originator


Resource location online
Location https://www.fws.gov/arcata/shc/marten/#data

HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
Used to reference source of coastal marten historical range.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title Humboldt Marten Historical Range
Alternate titles Hist Range
Publication date
Indeterminate date unknown


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


Other citation details
Additional Info: Slauson, K.M., G.A. Schmidt, W.J. Zielinski, P.J. Detrich, R.L. Callas, J. Thrailkill, B. Devlin-Craig, D.A. Early, K.A. Hamm, K.N. Schmidt, A. Transou, and C.J. West. 2019a. A conservation assessment and strategy for the Humboldt marten (Martes caurina humboldtensis) in California and Oregon. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-260. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Arcata, CA. 124 pp.


Responsible party
Organization's name USDA Forest Service (presumed)
Contact's role originator


HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
Modeled habitat from habitat suitability analysis.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title A landscape habitat suitability model for the Humboldt marten (Martes caurina humboldtensis) in coastal California and coastal Oregon
Alternate titles USFS Model
Publication date 2019


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format raster digital data


Responsible party
Organization's name Slauson, K.M., W.J. Zielinski, T.A. Kirk, and D.W. LaPlante
Contact's role originator


Resource location online
Location Published manuscript: https://doi.org/10.3955/046.093.0104

HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
Revised Land Use Allocation (LUA) classifications for the BLM NCO office.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title BLM Northwestern and Coastal Oregon (NCO) Record of Decision (ROD) Land Use Allocations Polygons
Alternate titles BLM NCO ROD
Publication date 2016


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


Responsible party
Organization's name U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Contact's role originator


Resource location online
Location https://www.blm.gov/or/plans/rmpswesternoregon/rod/rod-details.php?id=15622

HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
Revised Land Use Allocation (LUA) classifications for the BLM SWO office.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title BLM Southwestern Oregon (SWO) Record of Decision (ROD) Land Use Allocations Polygons
Alternate titles BLM SWO ROD
Publication date 2016


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


Responsible party
Organization's name U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Contact's role originator


Resource location online
Location https://www.blm.gov/or/plans/rmpswesternoregon/rod/rod-details.php?id=15623

HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
Land management boundaries for federal departments and agencies, as well as general classifications for state and local government lands.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title BLM National Surface Management Agency Area Polygons - National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA)
Alternate titles BLM SMA 2019
Publication date 2019


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


Responsible party
Organization's name U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Contact's role originator


Resource location online
Location https://landscape.blm.gov/geoportal/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B2A8B8906-7711-4AF7-9510-C6C7FD991177%7D

HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
Land management boundaries for federal departments and agencies, as well as general classifications for state and local government lands.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title BLM National Surface Management Agency Area Polygons - National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA)
Alternate titles BLM SMA 2020
Publication date 2020


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


Responsible party
Organization's name U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Contact's role originator


HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
OR/CA state line boundary.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title TIGER/Line Shapefiles: State Boundaries
Alternate titles TIGER State Lines
Publication date 2017


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


Responsible party
Organization's name U.S. Census Bureau
Contact's role originator


Resource location online
Location https://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/tiger-geodatabases.html

HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title Species status assessment report for the coastal marten (Martes caurina), Version 2.0
Alternate titles USFWS SSA
Publication date 2018-07


Presentation formats publication
FGDC geospatial presentation format publication


Responsible party
Organization's name U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Contact's role originator


HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
Existing published final critical habitat boundaries that potentially intersect coastal marten pCH.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title USFWS Threatened & Endangered Species Active Critical Habitat Report, Aggregate of All Critical Habitat Shapes for All Species
Alternate titles USFWS Critical Habitat
Publication date 2019


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


Responsible party
Organization's name U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)
Contact's role originator


Resource location online
Location https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/table/critical-habitat.html

HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
Contemporary verifiable detections of coastal marten compiled by FWS biologists in the Arcata FWO.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title Humboldt Marten Contemporary Verifiable Detections (Unpublished Data)
Alternate titles Detections
Publication date 2019-03


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


Responsible party
Organization's name U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office
Contact's role originator


HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
NHDFlowline data used to define Klamath River line in Northern CA.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title USGS National Hydrography Geodatabase
Alternate titles USGS NHD
Publication date 2018


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


Responsible party
Organization's name U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
Contact's role originator


Resource location online
Location /vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Hydrography/NHD/State/HighResolution/GDB/

HideSource citation


HideSource data


Source data
Description
Northwest Forest Plan Land Use Allocation (LUA) classifications.


Source medium name digital and/or hardcopy
Source citation
Title Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) Land Use Allocations (LUA)
Alternate titles NWFP LUA
Publication date 2013


Presentation formats digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format vector digital data


Responsible party
Organization's name USDA Forest Service (Pacific Northwest Region, Umpqua National Forest, Roseburg, OR) and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (Pacific Region, Regional Office, Portland, OR)
Contact's role originator


Resource location online
Location https://www.fs.fed.us/r6/reo/library/maps.html

HideSource citation


HideSource data


HideLineage

Geoprocessing history

Process
Date 2022-09-1213:43:18
Tool location c:\program files\arcgis\pro\Resources\ArcToolbox\Toolboxes\Data Management Tools.tbx\UpdateSchema
Command issued
Include in lineage when exporting metadata No


Process
Date 2022-09-1610:16:01
Tool location c:\program files\arcgis\pro\Resources\ArcToolbox\toolboxes\Conversion Tools.tbx\FeatureClassToFeatureClass
Command issued
Include in lineage when exporting metadata No


Process
Date 2022-09-1610:16:17
Tool location c:\program files\arcgis\pro\Resources\ArcToolbox\toolboxes\Data Management Tools.tbx\Project
Command issued
Include in lineage when exporting metadata No


Process
Date 2022-09-1610:16:35
Tool location c:\program files\arcgis\pro\Resources\ArcToolbox\toolboxes\Data Management Tools.tbx\Rename
Command issued
Include in lineage when exporting metadata No


HideGeoprocessing history

Distribution

Distributor
Contact information
Organization's name U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Contact's position ECOS Development Team
Contact's role distributor


Contact information
Phone
Voice 970-266-2999

Address
Type both
Delivery point 1201 Oakridge Dr.
City Fort Collins
Administrative area CO
Postal code 80525
Country US
e-mail address http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/helpTickets/create

HideContact information


Available format
Name Web Feature Service - All Critical Habitat


Ordering process
Terms and fees None

Transfer options
Online source
Location http://services.arcgis.com/QVENGdaPbd4LUkLV/arcgis/rest/services/USFWS_Critical_Habitat/FeatureServer

HideDistributor


Distribution format
* Name File Geodatabase Feature Class


Transfer options
* Transfer size 1.210


Online source
Location https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/BIOS
Function performed information

Online source
Location https://filelib.wildlife.ca.gov/Public/BDB/GIS/BIOS/Public_Datasets/3000_3099/ds3018.zip
Function performed download

Online source
Location https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/table/critical-habitat.html
Function performed information

HideDistribution

Fields

Details for object ds3018
* Type Feature Class
* Row count 0
Definition
Proposed Critical Habitat for Martes caurina (Pacific Marten, Coastal Distinct Population Segment)
Definition source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service


Field OBJECTID
* Alias OBJECTID
* Data type OID
* Width 4
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
* Field description
Internal feature number.
* Description source
Esri
* Description of values
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.


HideFieldOBJECTID


Field Shape
* Alias Shape
* Data type Geometry
* Width 0
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Feature geometry.
Description source
ESRI
* Description of values
Coordinates defining the features.


HideFieldShape


Field Shape_Area
* Alias Shape_Area
* Data type Double
* Width 8
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
* Field description
Area of feature in internal units squared.
* Description source
Esri
* Description of values
Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.


HideFieldShape_Area


Field COMNAME
* Alias COMNAME
* Data type String
* Width 200
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Legal common name of the species
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldCOMNAME


Field SCINAME
* Alias SCINAME
* Data type String
* Width 200
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Binomial or trinomial scientific name
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldSCINAME


Field SPCODE
* Alias SPCODE
* Data type String
* Width 4
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Unique Species Code referencing the species for the critical habitat being submitted
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldSPCODE


Field VIPCODE
* Alias VIPCODE
* Data type String
* Width 3
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Unique Population Code referencing the species for the critical habitat being submitted
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldVIPCODE


Field UNIT
* Alias UNIT
* Data type String
* Width 20
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Critical habitat unit code
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldUNIT


Field SUBUNIT
* Alias SUBUNIT
* Data type String
* Width 20
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Critical Habitat subunit code
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldSUBUNIT


Field UNITNAME
* Alias UNITNAME
* Data type String
* Width 50
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Critical Habitat unit name
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldUNITNAME


Field SUBUNITNAM
* Alias SUBUNITNAM
* Data type String
* Width 50
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Critical Habitat subunit name
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldSUBUNITNAM


Field STATUS
* Alias STATUS
* Data type String
* Width 20
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Critical Habitat Status
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
List of values
Value FINAL
Description Final Critical Habitat
Enumerated domain value definition source U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service


Value PROPOSED
Description Proposed Critical Habitat
Enumerated domain value definition source U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service


Value EXCLUDED
Description Excluded (4A3 or 4B2)
Enumerated domain value definition source U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service


Value VACATED
Description Vacated by Court Order
Enumerated domain value definition source U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service


HideFieldSTATUS


Field LEADOFFICE
* Alias LEADOFFICE
* Data type String
* Width 10
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Lead Office Cost Center Code
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldLEADOFFICE


Field COOPOFFICE
* Alias COOPOFFICE
* Data type String
* Width 25
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Cooperating Office Cost Center Code
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldCOOPOFFICE


Field COOPOFMORE
* Alias COOPOFMORE
* Data type String
* Width 254
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Additional Cooperating Office Cost Center Codes
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldCOOPOFMORE


Field FEDREG
* Alias FEDREG
* Data type String
* Width 10
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Federal Register ID
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldFEDREG


Field PUBDATE
* Alias PUBDATE
* Data type String
* Width 8
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Federal Register publication date
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldPUBDATE


Field EFFECTDATE
* Alias EFFECTDATE
* Data type String
* Width 8
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Effective date for critical habitat designation
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldEFFECTDATE


Field VACATEDATE
* Alias VACATEDATE
* Data type String
* Width 8
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Date critical habitat designation vacated
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
HideFieldVACATEDATE


Field Shape_Length
* Alias Shape_Length
* Data type Double
* Width 8
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
* Field description
Length of feature in internal units.
* Description source
Esri
* Description of values
Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.


HideFieldShape_Length


Field ACCURACY
* Alias ACCURACY
* Data type String
* Width 50
* Precision 0
* Scale 0
Field description
Accuracy items or concerns
Description source
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
List of values
Value Temporal Adjustment
Description Data is dependent on temporal factors
Enumerated domain value definition source U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service


Value Seasonal Adjustment
Description Data is dependent on seasonal factors
Enumerated domain value definition source U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service


Value Tidal Adjustment
Description Data is dependent on tidal fluctuations
Enumerated domain value definition source U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service


Value Historical Adjustment
Description Reference features, streams, boundaries, etc. have changed
Enumerated domain value definition source U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service


Value Source Adjustment
Description Source data is inconsistent or coarse
Enumerated domain value definition source U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service


Value Other
Description Other concern
Enumerated domain value definition source U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service


HideFieldACCURACY


HideDetails for objectds3018


HideFields

Metadata Details

* Metadata language English(UNITED STATES)
Metadata character set utf8 - 8 bit UCS Transfer Format


Scope of the data described by the metadata dataset
Scope name * dataset


* Last update 2022-09-16


ArcGIS metadata properties
Metadata format ArcGIS1.0
Standard or profile used to edit metadata FGDC


Created in ArcGIS for the item 2022-09-1610:16:13
Last modified in ArcGIS for the item 2022-09-1610:16:00


Automatic updates
Have been performed Yes
Last update 2022-09-1610:16:00


HideMetadata Details

Metadata Contacts

Metadata contact
Organization's name U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office
Contact's position Biologist - Data Manager
Individual's name Joel Shinn
Contact's role point of contact


Contact information
Phone
Voice 707-822-7201
Fax 707-822-8411

Address
Type both
Delivery point 1655 Heindon Rd.
City Arcata
Administrative area CA
Postal code 95521
Country US
e-mail address joel_shinn@fws.gov

HideContact information


HideMetadata Contacts

Metadata Maintenance

Maintenance
Update frequency unknown


HideMetadata Maintenance

Thumbnail and Enclosures